Update #EndSARS report: US seeks justice for victims, over 75,000 sign ICC petition

On Friday, the US Secretary of State met with members of the civil society in Abuja, reiterating that the US’s demand for justice.

Blinken told the CSOs: “We saw the conclusion this week of the independent Lagos State Judicial Panel of Inquiry’s work and the transmission of its final report. And this is clearly an important step toward accountability for the killings and other abuses alleged to have been committed by security forces during the EndSARS protests, a year ago.

“So, we’re very much looking forward to the Federal Government and the Lagos State Government and other state governments taking measures to address the alleged abuses, as well as the grievances of victims and their families.

“Reports are critical, but what counts as much and even more is whether there’s action that follows those reports.”

75,000 Nigerians sign ICC petition, demand Buhari’s prosecution

Meanwhile, a petition by Reno Omokri, a former Special Assistant to President Goodluck Jonathan, on the change.org platform received 76,420 signatures on Friday.

The petition, which was filed on Wednesday, was directed at the International Criminal Court and comes after the Lagos #EndSARS panel indicted the Buhari administration in its report.

At over 75,471 signatures, the petition is the first of Nigerian origin to hit that number in two days.

The petition is titled, ‘A Petition to The International Criminal Court to Arraign Muhammadu Buhari for Crimes Against Humanity’.

The petition sought to have Buhari tried and imprisoned by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity believed to have happened at Lekki tollgate on October 20, 2020.

Omokri wrote in the petition: “Following the murders of these protesters, the Buhari administration denied that the incident ever occurred. They threatened those, like myself, who insisted, with proof, that this massacre happened. The government even threatened to jail people who called for those behind the murders to be brought to book.”

51 persons killed with rifles during #EndSARS protests in Lagos – Panel report

A close look at the report by the panel of inquiry revealed that 51 persons died from “gunshot injuries from rifled weapon,” during last year’s #EndSARS protest in Lagos State.

The victims’ corpses were among a total of 99 corpses picked up from various locations in the state.

The testimony of the forensic pathologist from the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Prof. John Obafunwa, was documented in the panel report, spanning through pages 75 to 109 pages of the report.

Obafunwa gave the cause of death of each of the 99 corpses he conducted autopsies on.

He gave the cause of death of 51 of them as “gunshot injuries from rifled weapon.”

However, he said the corpses presented to him were brought from various locations such as the Lekki toll gate, police stations, correctional centres, general hospitals and other parts of the state.

Obafunwa, in his testimony, said out of the 51 corpses that died from “rifled gunshots,” eight were brought from Ikotun Police Station, three from Olosan and Denton police stations each, one from Ifako police station; 19 from Ikoyi Prisons, one from Lekki toll gate and one from Anisere in Ojota.

The pathologist added that a body each was brought from the Bariga area, Ado Road in Ajah, TVC Compound in Ketu, CMS, Ilasan in Ajah, Ikoyi, Akiode bus stop in Ojodu, Randle Close in Surulere and Mushin General Hospital, while two were brought from Lagos Island General Hospital.

The locations where three of the bodies were brought from were not stated while names of 36 victims were unknown. In some cases, names of cops who deposited bodies in mortuaries were not known.

Aside from the 51 bodies, about four victims were said to have died from shotgun wounds – commonly wielded by hoodlums – with pellets recovered from the corpses while others died of other injuries.

Obafunwa explained that there were two broad classifications of gunshot injuries, noting that where “a handgun or rifle is used, a bullet is expected to be discharged from it; as opposed to a shotgun which releases pellets.”

He clarified that guns that discharged pellets were not “typically seen to or used” by law enforcement agencies, adding that “security agencies are automatically ruled out of being responsible for the death of a person where examination of the injury reveals that the victim was shot by a gun that fires pellets.”

Although the pathologist did not mention the class of guns security agents usually bear, the National President, National Association of Criminologists and Security Practitioners of Nigeria, Williams Ekposon, said they are constitutionally empowered to carry rifles.

He stated, “By virtue of the Constitution and the Law Enforcement Act, rifles are meant for those that secure the state. Security is in the hands of the government. Security agents are meant to carry rifles for the purpose of defence. Proliferation of arms has given some criminals access to rifles.”

Drawing its conclusion on Obafunwa’s testimony, the panel said, “The fact of lack of identity of some of the other 96 corpses on the list supplied by Professor Obafunwa would not obliterate the fact that some of them could have come from the Lekki Toll Gate incident of October 20, 2020 or that some other unidentified corpses may have been removed by their families or the military, as claimed by the #EndSARS protesters, far and beyond the list tendered by Professor Obafunwa.”

Lagos lawyer condemns report leakage, says it’s security risk

But counsel for the Lagos State Government at the panel, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), has faulted the panel’s report, contending that it contains at least 40 discrepancies.

Owonikoko further argued that it was wrong for the panel’s report to have been leaked to the public, while the government had yet to prepare a white paper on it.

“By law, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the panel were not supposed to be made public. The report making rounds on social media is a draft of a minority opinion because I was there all through the proceedings.

“I am particularly shocked to read what is contained in the report because it is not completely accurate. I sighted over 40 discrepancies in this report, including awarding N15m to someone who was a witness to a police brutality incident that had nothing to do with the Lekki incident. What kind of report is that?” Owonikoko said on Thursday during an interview on Arise TV.

When contacted on phone by one of our correspondents on Friday to throw more light on his position, he declined to speak further but noted that he was particularly displeased with the recommendation of the panel that a Divisional Police Officer and an Area Commander in Lagos should be prosecuted.

Owonikoko said, “I will give you one example for you to know the security implication of what they are doing. In that report, it was recommended that the DPO of Maroko should be dismissed and that he should be prosecuted; they also recommended that the Area Commander of Lekki-Epe should be dismissed from service and prosecuted. Now, does the Governor of Lagos State have the power to dismiss a serving police officer?

“If anything happens to people in Lekki today up to Epe and the governor has to take action, to invite security, is it not these people he will ask to go and do it? So, a panel set up by this government recommended that they should be dismissed for no reason, then you expect them to be giving security to all of us who are living in that axis, does that make sense? Should that kind of report have come out in the open? And they are aware that that’s the recommendation and the state is going to rely on them for the security of the people. It is even a security danger for anybody to be talking about that thing (panel report) now. People are so naïve; they don’t know the security implication of leaking this kind of thing. I will advice that people should just wait for the government’s white paper.”

Panel member, Adegboruwa defends report

But one of the members of the panel, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN), maintained that there were documents to defend the report submitted to the state government.

Adegboruwa, in a statement titled, ‘EndSARS Panel: I Acted on the Mandate of the Governor,’ said it was uncharitable for the government to talk about discrepancies.

Adegboruwa said, “I have listened to the narratives of the Lagos State Government through one of its learned senior counsel at the #EndSARS panel, to the effect that Nigerians should reject the report of the panel because I signed it, since I was not present at some of the sittings of the panel.

“It is indeed uncharitable for the same government that urged the panel not to be held down by strict rules of technicalities of law in order to unravel the real truth about the Lekki toll gate incident, to now through its counsel, talk about alleged legal discrepancies, to frustrate the good work of the panel that it set up.

“There are documents to back up and defend the report submitted to the governor by the panel but I have chosen to defer to His Excellency and to await the white paper as promised because I believe that the governor meant well in setting up the panel and giving us free hand to operate. I appeal to His Excellency to continue in that note of sincerity.”

I don’t regret pulling out of panel, says Oduala

Meanwhile, an activist, Rinu Oduala, has said that she did not regret stepping down from the panel in February.

Oduala was a youth representative on the panel till February 2021 when she pulled out over the planned reopening of the Lekki toll gate.

This content is gotten from Punchng

Post a Comment